BLOG: Court Decisions
Ramsey v. Commissioner of Highways: Is there a Santa Claus in Virginia?
Coming to you from Virginia – care of our Owner’s Counsel colleague Robert Thomas – is the case of Ramsey v. Commissioner of Highways, which involves Virginia DOT’s attempt to change its valuation position at trial. Thomas’ Blog entry here. In a nutshell, DOT offered the owner $246,292 before trial (based on an appraisal prepared by... Read More
Federal Judge Restrains Government Action On Dune Project in Margate
Yesterday, a United States District Court judge restrained the U.S. Army Corps and NJDEP from any further action towards their joint Little Egg Inlet to Barnegat Inlet Storm Damage Reduction Project pending further hearings to be held in two weeks time. The City of Margate, which owns the beach west of the State’s public trust... Read More
Ocean County Court: Challenge to Redevelopment Plan Ordinance Premature
Ocean County Assignment Judge Vincent Grasso dismissed a declaratory judgment action filed by a redeveloper against the Township of Ocean finding that the redeveloper had to exhaust its administrative remedies before coming to the Court for relief. Alternatively, it appears that the redeveloper was seeking to partially invalidate or revise an ordinance that had been... Read More
City of Pasadena Potentially Liable for Property Damage Caused by Its Trees
On August 14, 2014, the Second Appellate District Court of Appeal of California issued its landmark decision in City of Pasadena v. Superior Court of Califorina (Docket BC491467). The case arose out of a windstorm that occurred in November 2011. A City owned tree fell and damaged a residence insured by Mercury Casualty Company, which paid $293,000... Read More
An Insider's View to Georgia Abandonment Case
As a follow-up to our July 21st posting on a significant recent case from the Georgia Supreme Court, we’re thrilled to provide this special guest blog from Charles Pursley, Esq., who served as counsel to the property owner in the Dillard case. More info about Charles and his firm are available on his website. Thanks... Read More
California Court: Pre-condemnation Entry Statute Unconstitutional
A California appellate court recently declared its pre-condemnation entry statute unconstitutional. Property Reserve, Inc. v. Dep’t of Water Resources (JCCP No. 4594, March 13, 2014). While we are not going to recount all the details of the comprehensive opinion here, the State was seeking access to private property pre-condemnation in connection with a proposed tunnel... Read More
Newark Property Owner Snuffed on Damage Claim After Dismissal of Taking
A New Jersey appellate court recently decided the sequel to a failed condemnation action from 2012 regarding property in Newark. The property in question was commercial property owned in condominium form by New United Corp. and the Essex County Improvement Authority (“ECIA”), containing five buildings and a parking garage. Due to prior disputes between the... Read More
Appeals Court: Hearing Was Required Regarding Impact of Wetlands
On May 6, 2014, the Appellate Division published its opinion in New Jersey Transit v. Mori (Docket No. A-0122-12T4). The case involved acquisition of property impacted by wetlands regulated by the Army Corps of Engineers. Plaintiff’s estimate of compensation for the one acre (out of fourteen) partial taking was $61,000 given the presence of wetlands... Read More
Netherlands v State – Regulatory Taking Denied
“The State may not put so potent a Hobbesian stick into the Lockean bundle.” Palazzolo v. Rhode Island, 533 U.S. 606, 627 (2001). That was the United States Supreme Court’s response thirteen years ago to Rhode Island’s argument that property owners could claim no loss from legislation shaping and defining property rights enacted prior to... Read More
Experts' Valuation Arguments Rejected as Net Opinion in Hoboken Taking
Hudson County Assignment Judge Peter Bariso recently rejected a property owner’s argument that the date of value should be a date earlier than the commencement of condemnation action on August 23, 2012. City of Hoboken v. Ponte Equities, Inc. (Docket No. HUD-L-4095-12). The property owner argued that the date of value should have been June... Read More
