BLOG: Property Tax Appeal

Tax Court Expands Rights of Residential Taxpayers in Presenting Cases Before County Boards of Taxation

by: Anthony F. Della Pelle
7 May 2010
As hearings before County Boards of Taxation throughout the State get underway for 2010 tax appeals, the New Jersey Tax Court has provided some clarification on what evidence is admissible in these proceedings, and limits the authority of a County Board to dismiss for lack of prosecution (“LOP”).   In Austin v. Township of Pemberton, Judge... Read More

Waste of Taxpayer Money?

by: Anthony F. Della Pelle
4 May 2010
McKirdy & Riskin’s Anthony Della Pelle was featured this past Sunday in Fox News’ coverage of legislation in Utah attempting to authorize the use of eminent domain to take property owned by the U.S. government.  Click on the picture below to learn more about the State of Utah’s efforts to acquire federally-owned property: [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPek7AOyGcg] The video may... Read More

Vineland Property Owners Fighting Redevelopment Taking

by: Anthony F. Della Pelle
4 May 2010
Our New Jersey Condemnation Law Blog recently reported how the City of Vineland reduced the threat of eminent domain as part of its redevelopment project, but several property owners who still face the threat of eminent domain have announced their intentions to protect their property interests.   Joseph and Joanne Marghella, owners of the properties that... Read More

Washington Township Farm Targeted for Water Rights

by: Anthony F. Della Pelle
3 May 2010
Washington Township property owner Robert Smith finds himself embroiled in a dispute with the local municipal utilities authority, which seeks to use eminent domain to seize a water production well on Smith’s 100-acre farm.  The farm, which has been in Smith’s family for more than 200 years and has been farmed by Smith himself since... Read More

Atlantic City Appeals Roll On Without Conflict

by: Anthony F. Della Pelle
28 Apr 2010
According to the recently decided New Jersey Supreme Court case City of Atlantic City v. Trupos, __ N.J. __ (2010), matters are “substantially related” under RPC 1.9 for disqualification purposes if a lawyer received confidential information while representing a former client that can be used in subsequent adversarial representation, or facts relevant from the prior... Read More

Atlantic Yards Project Not Done With Objectors Despite Recent Settlement

by: Anthony F. Della Pelle
26 Apr 2010
While the Atlantic Yards project has staved off nearly all of its legal challenges, and last week entered into a settlement with lead activist Daniel Goldstein, several loose ends remain.  Goldstein recently accepted a $3 million settlement to relinquish any remaining claims and will be moving from his residence this summer.  Watch ABC News’ video... Read More

Long Branch Redevelopment Dealt Another Blow

by: Anthony F. Della Pelle
19 Apr 2010
 A New Jersey appellate court dealt another setback last week to the Oceanfront Broadway redevelopment project in Long Branch.  Reversing the decision of the trial court, an appellate panel concluded that the City’s designation of the study area properties as in need of redevelopment in 1996 did not satisfy the heightened standard of the New Jersey... Read More

More about Freddy's Bar and Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn

by: Anthony F. Della Pelle
14 Apr 2010
Fox News coverage of the continuing saga of Atlantic Yards and one property owner’s fight to keep his property.  Former New Jersey Superior Court Judge Andrew Napolitano provides commentary [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPVQZt5ZlGA]... Read More

Billionaires vs. Brooklyn's Best Bar: Eminent Domain Abuse & The Atlantic Yards Project

by: Anthony F. Della Pelle
14 Apr 2010
Watch this video regarding the Atlantic Yards redevelopment project in Brooklyn:[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rgdp3XupCo0]... Read More

"Man Bites Dog" Eminent Domain Story as Utah Seeks to Condemn Federal Land

by: Anthony F. Della Pelle
5 Apr 2010
Utah Governor Gary Herbert recently signed legislation,  HB324, which authorizes the State of Utah to use its power of eminent domain to take federally owned lands. Herbert argues that Utah is entitled to take the land because the federal government refuses to sell certain properties which could be developed or mined for natural resources. More than sixty percent... Read More